7-year plan aligns U.S. with Europe's economy
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
"United States of Europe"
"United States of Europe" When?
Robert R. Barney
The above story comes as no surprise to me. As long as 30 years ago I realized that World War II was just the beginning of Europe's eventual idenity to be revealed. I was a listener to Garner Ted Armstrong, who together with his father Herbert W. Armstrong was predicting a United States of Europe in 1935! Then again right after WWII in 1945. They were scoffed at in 1965 when they said that the Soviet Union would not be the endtime beast government, and probably would collapse! They were right.
The following is an article from 1989 that was even at the time the same message as he gave in 1955, the year I was born. Read this and understand just what does Europe, the EU and Germany have to do with the Bible. It is fascinating!
Click on the link Below for the surprising facts about The EU and what it means to YOU!
Saturday, January 12, 2008
Oprah is Not What She Claims To Be
By Robert R. Barney
I made this prediction on RaceRap.Com, our sister site several weeks ago, as well as to my family and friends. I don't think many believed me because of the subject matter. The subject Oprah and her support of Barak Obama. I predicted that her endorsement would backfire and that voters would see this move for what it was. A black person supporting a black candidate only because he is black. That is the Plain Truth folks, and many angry e-mails being sent to Oprah agree with my contention. Even blacks are angered at Oprah in these e-mails and some are suggesting that Obama lost the New Hampshire because of the Oprah endorsement! I stated that this would happen the day after her endorsement on RaceRap!
Oprah Winfrey has made billions convincing WHITE America that she is color blind. She has the major media helping her make this imagine as a black woman, who cares about everyone regardless of color. It is just a fairy tale and most are just too afraid to expose it. Unlike Bill Cosby or Morgan Freeman who are "the real deal" Oprah is a carefully marketed "brand" invented with a bunch of hype and a dash of lies. Here are some exerpts from Salon.Com:
By continuing to hawk "The Secret," a mishmash of offensive self-help cliches, Oprah Winfrey is squandering her goodwill and influence, and preaching to the world that mammon is queen.
By Peter Birkenhead Salon.Com
Why "venality"? Because, with survivors of Auschwitz still alive, Oprah writes this about "The Secret" on her Web site, "the energy you put into the world -- both good and bad -- is exactly what comes back to you. This means you create the circumstances of your life with the choices you make every day." "Venality," because Oprah, in the age of AIDS, is advertising a book that says, "You cannot 'catch' anything unless you think you can, and thinking you can is inviting it to you with your thought." "Venality," because Oprah, from a studio within walking distance of Chicago's notorious Cabrini Green Projects, pitches a book that says, "The only reason any person does not have enough money is because they are blocking money from coming to them with their thoughts."
Here is some more quotes from the story:
Oprah has areputation for doing good -- she probably has more perceived moral authority than anyone in this country -- and she has done a lot of good. But in light of her zealous support of a book that says, in this time of entrenched, systemic, institutionalized poverty, this time of no-bid contracts for war profiteers and heckuva-job governance, that "you can have, be, or do anything," isn't it reasonable to ask about why she does what she does, and the way she does it? http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2007/03/05/the_secret/
It is clear to me and any other honest person that Oprah Winfrey is the loser with her endoresement of Barak Obama, and she should be. She is not the person the media has made her out to be. She is Al Sharpton-but smarter
On the other hand black stars like Bill Cosby and Morgan Freeman are doing more to help sooth racial tensions in American than a thousand Oprah's could every do. They are geniune. They understand to rid America of bigotry all races must stop their "hiddden agenda's" and become just people. Morgan Freeman summed this up the best when he said, "I don't want to be thought of as the best black actor in America, I want to be thought of as a great actor." Color has nothing to do with it. Shamefully, Oprah is not what she claims to be.
YOUR HEALTH TODAY!
The Truth About Vaccines By World Renowned Scientist! SHOCKING VIDEO!! Merck Confesses that Cancer Virus is found in Vaccines
Friday, January 11, 2008
The Shocking Plain Truth About Mohammed and the Dome of the Rock?
The Shocking Plain Truth About Mohammed and the Dome of the Rock?
CBS won't tell you, ABC won't tell you, not even Fox News will tell you but the Plain Truth about "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" for Muslims is a 20th century HOAX! According to historians, Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. In fact the word Jerusalem NEVER appears in the Koran! Never! Mohammed was never there. Ther isn't one account of him being there until 1930! Why 1930? Well we all know that is about the time when many Jews fleeing Nazi Germany was starting to move back to the land of Israel and a move went out to try and prevent this from happening by inventing the story. Yes, the Muslims invaded Jerusalem and conquered it, built the Dome of the Rock, but they did so to commerate the story of Abraham and not Mohammed....
In the days of the Prophet Mohammed, who died in 632 of the Common Era, Jerusalem was a Christian city within the Byzantine Empire. Jerusalem was captured by Khalif Omar only in 638, six years after the Prophet Mohammed's death. Throughout all this time there were only churches in Jerusalem, and a church stood on the Temple Mount, called the Church of Saint Mary of Justinian, built in the Byzantine architectural style. And the Prophet Mohammed probably didn't ascend to heaven from the roof of a Christian Church!
Muslims in the 1930s knew that nationalist slogans alone would not succeed in uniting the masses against arriving Jewish refugees. They turned the struggle into a religious conflict. Muslims began calling for a holy war. The battle cry was simple and comprehensive: "Down with the Infidels!" From the time Herbert Samuel appointed Haj Amin to the position of Mufti, Haj Amin worked vigorously to raise Jerusalem's status as an Islamic holy center. He renovated the mosques on the Temple Mount, while conducting an unceasing campaign regarding the imminent Jewish "threat" to Moslem holy sites.
The Moslem "claim" to Jerusalem is based on what is written in the Koran, which although Jerusalem is not mentioned even once, nevertheless talks (in Sura 17:1) of the "Furthest Mosque": "Glory be unto Allah who did take his servant for a journey at night from the Sacred Mosque to the Furthest Mosque." But is there any foundation to the Moslem argument that this "Furthest Mosque" (Al-Masujidi al-Aksa) refers to what is today called the Aksa Mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, none whatsoever.
The Aksa Mosque was built 20 years after the Dome of the Rock, which was built in 691-692 by Khalif Abd El Malik. The name "Omar Mosque" is therefore a misnomer. In or around 711, or about 80 years after the Prophet Mohammed died, Malik's son, Abd El-Wahd - who ruled from 705-715 - reconstructed the destroyed Christian-Byzantine Church of St. Mary and converted it into a mosque. He left the structure as it was, a typical Byzantine "basilica" structure with a row of pillars on either side of the rectangular "ship" in the center. All he added was an onion-like dome on top of the building to make it look like a mosque. He then named it El-Aksa, so it would sound like the one mentioned in the Koran.
Therefore it is historically clear that Prophet Mohammed could never have had this mosque in mind when he compiled the Koran, since it did not exist for another three generations after his death. Rather, as many scholars long ago established, Mohammed intended the mosque in Medina as El Aksa, the "Furthest Mosque." This is another instance where religious reproof and instruction is being twisted for political gains. It is also clear that our modern day media will never tell you this!
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Kerry Snubs Edwards - HIS OWN VEEP Partner from 2004
By Robert R. Barney
Is it just me, or does anyone else have a problem with John Kerry endorsing Barak Obama over his own Vice President nominee! As far as I am concerned this shows to me that John Kerry has absolutely no character and maybe those swift boat guys were honest after all. How can someone run for the Presidency of the United States with a running mate that he obviously didn't believe in? Or is it that he supported John Edwards before he didn't support him. I see why he is flip flop Kerry and should never be taken seriously. Most pundits considerate Edwards the better part of the ticket in 2004 and that Kerry himself was the problem.
It galls me to see that a man who wanted to be President was willing to STICK to the American people a man who at a heartbeat away could have been our next President! Now we see that he didn't really believe in the man all along. That makes him nothing more than a liar in my eyes and I am even more thankful today that he wasn't elected President.
This opinion has NOTHING to do with Barak Obama. I don't think he would be any worse than John Edwards --- BOTH ARE TERRIBLE socialist snake oil salesman. My problem lies with Kerry and Kerry alone. Until Democrats can start running reputable and ethical candidates, they will continue to be a party of liars and not worthy of any votes.
Nancy Pelosi ran on a ticket of getting our troops home and this lie helped Democrats win both houses. They have never delivered on this promise. LIES LIES LIES.....
FOR MORE ON THIS VISIT:
http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/kerry-snubs-edwards-endorses-obama/20080110095609990001
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)